Originally published by charitytimes: www.charitytimes.com
Written by Eleanor Urben
23/10/18
The average age of a charity trustee is 61. Yet diversity improves governance and organisation success . Given that 85% of people under 35 would consider becoming a trustee it is clear that charities should be exploring ways to recruit young people.
What are the benefits of young trustees?
• Contributing a different perspective and fresh insights to board discussions and a healthy challenge to established assumptions and ways of doing things.
• Enthusiasm for learning the role – they are often keen to develop their existing skills whilst helping a charitable cause. This enthusiasm means that they will be more likely to bring energy, creativity and new ideas.
• If your beneficiaries include young people, young trustees can provide useful insight and perspectives on beneficiary needs and experience, and increase the board’s credibility in the eyes of this group.
• Benefits the charity sector as a whole as it helps to engage younger people with sector, developing the next generation of potential charity leaders and supporters.
How to attract them and keep them
Ensure that your advert and role description are written in a way that attracts young people and does not include criteria which excludes them. Consider testing out recruitment materials on young people first. Signal your openness and recruit via multiple channels, beyond your usual networks.
One of the biggest obstacles young trustees face is lack of flexibility with their time, because they are likely to be in employment or education. Be open to adapt to the needs of your trustees by giving plenty of notice prior to board meetings and scheduling meetings for a time which all trustees can make.
It is also important to offer young trustees a good induction process to ensure that they feel supported and valued whilst gaining a deeper understanding of their role.
An existing trustee could take on the role of a mentor to provide for a young trustee. Recruiting more than one young trustee at a time can help them feel less alone. Resources, such as The Young Charity Trustees Guide can also be useful.
Depending on their background and experience, you might need to consider other ways of ensuring that your young trustee can participate on an equal footing with other trustees.
Consider how you can make your board papers more accessible, and your meetings engaging. All trustees will benefit from this. Giving young trustees a specific role or focus area that they can take the lead on can be a good way to empower them.
Inspiration
Chantal Chang, young trustee, Leap Confonting Conflict: “The other trustees are keen to hear what I have to say because I’m aware of the challenges for young people and can provide insight into how our work really affects them.”
Vicky Smith, young trustee, Focus Birmingham: “I wanted to expand my understanding of leadership at a governance level in practice. And it’s a cause I feel really passionate about. It was a perfect fit because the charity was looking for someone with marketing and fundraising skills and I have significant relevant experience.”
Eleanor Urben is trusteeworks manager at Reach Volunteering
Originally published by charitytimes: www.charitytimes.com
Written by Charity Times
04/10/18
Langley House Trust, Autistica and Capoeira4Refugees were among the big winners at the Charity Times Awards 2018, celebrated with a packed ceremony in London last night.
Hundreds of people gathered at the Westminster Park Plaza to see Langley House Trust crowned the Charity of the Year (income over £5m). The judges recognised the charity in particular for its well-rounded application that showcased “excellent” charity management.
Capoeira4Refugees, a charity supporting capoeira trainers in conflict zones all over the world, was named Charity of the Year (income of less than £1m) for evidencing “real impact and growth” over the past year.
Autistica took home the award for Charity of the Year (income of £1-5m) and was praised by judges for “creating a fantastic impact in such a short space of time”. They said the charity showcased strength in engaging beneficiaries in an innovative way.
Fundraising and development coach Amicky Carol Akiwumi was presented with the Outstanding Individual Achievement Award. Akiwumi is the director of Black Fundraisers UK, a trustee of the Institute of Fundraising and founder of Money4Youth.
She was recognised for her tireless efforts in helping to create a culture of change within fundraising. Nominated for becoming an active voice for diversity across the whole sector, judges said Akiwumi has not been afraid to speak up to champion for a better approach to workplace equality.
Bowel Cancer UK CEO, Deborah Alsina, was named Charity Principal of the Year after successfully leading the charity through a merger and adopting a successful and innovative approach to charity management in an increasingly digital world.
Silver Line chief executive, Sophie Andrews, was highly commended for the award thanks to her passion and dedication to providing a friendship service for older people.
Sarah Anne Sturmey topped the Rising CEO Star category after judges said she was a “huge influence” on the strength of project delivery at her charity. Fozia Irfan, CEO at Bedfordshire and Luton Community Foundation was highly commended.
Now in their 19th year, the awards attracted hundreds of high quality entries, which were then evaluated by an expert independent judging panel.
In addition to the charity of the year and individual categories, the awards as always set out to recognise a variety of fields of charity management, celebrating the best standards of leadership and professionalism.
The Charity Times Awards also recognise the efforts of private enterprises in supporting the sector, whether through charity partnerships or delivering excellent service.
The full list of winners and highly commended entrants is available below.
The winners
Advisory Provider of the Year
WINNER: Penningtons Manches
Investment Management
WINNER: Smith & Williamson Investment Management
Financial Management Award
WINNER: The Rochester Diocesan Society and Board of Finance
Best Use of Technology
WINNER: Chasing the Stigma with Mashbo
Fundraising Technology Award
WINNER: Encephalitis Society
Best Social Media Presence
WINNER: British Red Cross
Change Project of the Year
WINNER: The Care Workers Charity
HR Management Award
WINNER: St Mungo’s
PR Team of the Year
WINNER: Asthma UK
Campaigning Team of the Year
WINNER: Citizens Advice
Fundraising Team of the Year
WINNER: Cure Leukaemia
Corporate National Partnership of the Year with a Retailer
WINNER: Sustain: the alliance for better food and farming, Jamie’s Italian, Abokado and Leon
Corporate National Partnership of the Year with a Financial Institution
WINNER: Barclays, Catch22 and The Prince’s Trust
Corporate Community Local Involvement
WINNER: National Literacy Trust and British Land
Corporate Social Responsibility Project of the Year
WINNER: Trees for Cities and Bulb
Corporate National Partnership Champion
WINNER: Malaria No More UK and Fever-Tree
Cross-sector Partnership of the Year
WINNER: Good Things Foundation, Mind, Homeless Link – Reboot UK
Community Award
WINNER: The Scout Association
Social Investment Initiative
WINNER: City Bridge Trust & UBS
Supporting Executive of the Year
WINNER: Jenni Wiggle, Living Streets
Rising CEO Star
WINNER: Sarah Anne Sturmey, Pure Insight
Highly commended: Fozia Irfan, Bedfordshire and Luton Community Foundation
Charity Principal of the Year
WINNER: Deborah Alsina, Bowel Cancer UK
Highly commended: Sophie Andrews, The Silver Line
Outstanding Individual Achievement
WINNER: Carol Akiwumi
Charity of the Year: with an income of less than £1 million
WINNER: Capoeira4Refugees
Charity of the Year: with an income of £1 million – £5 million
WINNER: Autistica
Highly commended: Young Women’s Trust
Charity of the Year: with an income of more than £5 million
WINNER: Langley House Trust
Originally published by charitytimes: www.charitytimes.com
Written by Lauren Weymouth
10/09/18
The Fundraising Regulator has opened a consultation on the Code of Fundraising Practice, with the view to understanding its accessibility as a ‘straightforward and practical’ tool for fundraisers.
The Code of Fundraising Practice and its associated rulebooks for street, door-to-door and private site fundraising outline the standards expected of all charitable fundraising organisations across the UK.
According to the regulator, its consultation will focus on the style, presentation, clarity and accessibility of a new draft of the code, with respondents asked to feedback.
The new draft includes the following:
– A new table of contents and a simpler ordering of the code’s content
– A “plain English” review of the language used in the code
– A new code introduction
– A glossary of key terms used within the code
– A table of those rules proposed for deletion or amendment
– The face-to-face fundraising rulebooks being incorporated into the “collections” section of the code
The regulator said the decision to consult on the code follows “careful consideration and feedback” from the regulator’s first consultation last year; roundtable sessions with smaller charities; conversations with other regulators and bodies in the sector and queries and comments from members of the public.
The consultation will run for 10 weeks and will close on Friday 16 November 2018.
A summary of responses is set to be published on the consultation web pages together with the Fundraising Regulator’s final decisions regarding changes to the code. The regulator will be encouraging the sector to feed in its views during this period.
Commenting on the consultation, the Fundraising Regulator’s chair of the standards committee, Suzanne McCarthy said: “The Code of Fundraising Practice underpins the behaviours that we expect from fundraisers and organisations across the charitable fundraising sector.
“It is vital that all fundraisers can use and understand the Code confidently and with ease to ensure their organisation’s compliance. We are confident that this consultation will result in an improved experience for both fundraisers and the general public alike.”
Originally published by charitytimes: www.charitytimes.com
Written by Charity Times
31/08/18
Charity employees from around the UK have been invited to take part in a national survey on charities, with the chance to win £200 for their favourite charity.
The survey, run by the University of Suffolk, in partnership with insurance broker PolicyBee, has been designed to see how charities navigate risks they face, the way they’re governed, and complying with regulations.
PolicyBee is aiming to help grassroots organisations – those with an annual income of £500,000 or less – reduce their risk profile in a positive way, so they can invest maximum resources and energy into their charitable objectives and increase social impact.
Everybody who has a say in the running and direction of their charity or organisation has been invited to respond. This includes sole operators, trustees, chief execs, volunteers and more.
As a ‘thank you’ for taking part, everyone who completes the survey has the chance to be entered into a draw to win £200 for their charity.
Simply enter your charity email address when prompted at the end of the survey. Your answers won’t be linked to your email address and your contact details will only be used to inform you if you win.
Take the quick survey (less than 10 mins) survey here.
Originally published by charitytimes: www.charitytimes.com
Written by Gillian McKay
29/08/18
The revised disqualification rules for charity trustees and senior charity positions came into force on 1 August. This reflects the changes brought in by the additional powers granted under the Charities (Protection and Social Investment) Act 2016.
There have always been automatic reasons for disqualifying trustees, this revision extends the list of reasons for disqualification and extends the disqualification rules to the chief executive and chief financial officer roles. These roles are now considered ‘restricted’ under the disqualification rules.
The Commission’s guidance clearly states: “If you are disqualified you must not act in a trustee or relevant senior management position at a charity, unless and until your disqualification is waived by the Charity Commission”.
Therefore, under the new rules, any individual acting in either trustee, chief executive or finance director position, must either obtain a Charity Commission waiver or resign.
It is worth noting that it is the senior management function rather than the role title that defines whether a role is restricted or not. For smaller charities, both these functions may fall to one person, or there may be employees with split responsibilities, for example an office manager who also manages the finances, now being affected.
The penalties for continuing to act in these positions while knowingly disqualified include being asked to repay remuneration, benefits and expenses received while in post, or being referred to the police.
The list of reasons for disqualification includes unspent convictions for a number of specified criminal convictions and a list of civil court judgements. Charities are expected to review their internal procedures to accommodate these changes. For some of the criminal convictions, such as terrorist offences, bribery or fraud, there may be very few circumstances where a charity would consider such an individual suitable to remain in post. However, the list of relevant offences include those involving “deception or dishonesty”.
Annex A of the Commission’s guidance provides a list of offences, which may include dishonesty or deception, these include theft, fraud or obtaining service, by false representation or failing to disclose information. However, some convictions qualifying under this could, in some circumstances, be rather minor, for example petty shoplifting or forgetting to update insurance policy details on which there is a later claim.
Are there unexplored consequences for charities here? The Commission has been accepting applications for waivers since 1 February, encouraging early application in order to get a decision “in good time”. However, it is not clear how long it takes to obtain a waiver.
It is possible that an employee in a restricted position has been convicted of a dishonest offence, in the period after 1 August 2017, which they contested in court but lost. They are fined and the crime will be unspent a year from conviction.
The details of this were made perfectly aware to the trustees at the time. The trustees consider the offence to be suitably minor and that there are sufficient controls in place to mitigate any harm to the charity. The waiver is applied for but not received by 1 August.
Presumably this person must now resign, in which case there are several issues. What if the waiver is granted soon after, or the conviction becomes unspent shortly after? Can the individual demand to be reinstated and demand compensation and from whom?
Presumably the early application for waivers was to allow for charities to plan for such eventualities, but it is hard to see what could be concluded in this period given the uncertain nature of the outcome.
These are integral roles in the charity, expecting these individuals to now step down could have operational, legal and personal consequences for the charity and all of those involved.
Gillian McKay is head of charity and voluntary sector at the ICAEW
Originally published by charitytimes: www.charitytimes.com
Written by Charity Times
10/08/18
The government has launched its new civil society strategy, announcing a number of changes to the sector, but as always, the devil is in the detail. Here is a breakdown of everything you need to know:
Dormant assets
The government plans to release £20m from dormant charitable assets and place the funds into grassroots community organisations. The money will be distributed to community trusts and commitments to support corporate social responsibility. The inactive funds will also be plugged into the improvement of the take-up of the Social Value Act.
While charity bodies were generally happy about plans to release the assets, NCVO chief executive, Sir Stuart Etherington said more could be done: “There is an estimated £2 billion in dormant assets, which the government can use to start a real revolution in community ownership and participation, but three years after they began work on this, progress seems limited and there is no mention at all of dormant assets in today’s strategy,” he said.
“We hope they will provide more detail on this area in the near future.”
Corporate social responsibility
The strategy also pledges to strengthen corporate social responsibility by setting up a new leadership group with senior figures from business, investment and social sectors.
However, IoF chief executive, Peter Lewis argued the strategy “could have gone further” in clearly setting the government’s role in promoting philanthropy and giving across all government departments and “embedding an ambition to raise, celebrate, and promote charitable giving more widely”.
Grant-making
Elsewhere in the strategy document, the governement promised “a revival of grant-making”, with the view to “broaden the range of funding options for community initiatives”.
The government said all public bodies should follow the Grants Functional Standard, which sets out minimum standards for general grants. A “ministerial event” will be held with the aim of improving data infrastructure. It has also said there will be new guidance published for commissioners on grant-making to small and local charities.
Providing a voice
Digital also features heavily in the strategy, with the government pledging to launch regional pilots to trial creative ways of involving people in local democracy, such as through online polls for community decisions. It also claims it will use digital to help charities reach more people and will support charities to have their voices heard.
However, Bond head of policy and campaigns, Claire Godfrey, said the best way of giving civil society “the confidence to speak out”, would be to revise the Lobbying Act and “stop inserting anti-advocacy clauses into grant agreements”, but it claims the government’s new strategy does neither of those.
“We welcome the offer to work with civil society, regulators and other government departments to determine how to support advocacy and campaigning in the UK, but this is not enough. Real confidence will now have to come from actions rather than words.”
The Compact
Among other changes to the sector, the government has also announced it will renew its commitments to grants and the principles of the Compact, a document that sets out a series of principles and commitments governing the relationship between the social sector and the government.
NCVO welcomed this announcement, claiming it is something the organisation has long been campaigning for. “This is an important symbolic gesture to show the government takes its relationship with charities seriously. In particular, I hope it will reinforce good practice in collaborative policy-making. We know that the best solutions to challenges come when the government works together with expert charities,” Etherington said.
Originally published by charitytimes: www.charitytimes.com
Written by Lauren Weymouth
31/07/18
The charity sector must go further than “simple box-ticking” against their legal duties in order to improve safeguarding, the Charity Commission has said.
In response to a report published today by the International Development Committee about sexual abuse and exploitation in the aid sector, the regulator said charities should be judged “not just by what they do or achieve, but by how they go about it”.
The report found sexual abuse among the aid sector has been ongoing for a “long time” and the sector is guilty of being almost “complicit” in the scandal.
MPs declared abuse among aid charities as an “endemic” and “confirmed under-reporting” means the exact scale of it is “impossible to define”. It added that the cases that have come to light, such as those at Oxfam and Save the Children, are “only the tip of the iceberg”.
Commenting on these findings, Charity Commission director of investigations, monitoring and enforcement, Michelle Russell said: “The Commission is clear that sexual exploitation and abuse, and any other behaviours that put beneficiaries, staff, volunteers and members of the public at risk, have absolutely no place in charity.
“We are pleased that the report makes a number of helpful suggestions to the sector as to how these can be stamped out. We take safeguarding extremely seriously. Our role is to hold all charities, including those working in the international aid sector, to account for the way they fulfil their duties in keeping people safe,” she said.
However, Russell stressed the sector must do more to ensure it complies with legal duties, rather than ‘ticking-boxes’.
“We are particularly pleased to see the Committee’s focus on the responsibility of charity leaders to set an organisational culture that demonstrates zero tolerance for abuse,” she said.
“Charities should be judged not just by what they do or achieve, but by how they go about it. Our research shows that the public expect charities to demonstrate the highest standards are met through everything they do.
“In the context of safeguarding this means creating safe and trusted environments, including for victims to come forward if abuse does occur, and being transparent with us as the regulator, and the public where appropriate, when things go wrong. It is time for charities and their leadership to fully confront these issues with a real commitment to lasting and demonstrable change.
“We are pleased that the Committee recognises our crucial role in monitoring and upholding standards on safeguarding in charities, and welcome the Committee’s recommendation that the Commission should be properly resourced to meet these challenges. We will continue to work with government to ensure we are adequately resourced to meet future challenges.”
The Institute of Fundraising’s head of policy and external affairs also commented on the report, claiming the report highlights “hugely important issues for the international aid sector, as well as the need for all charities to ensure they have proper safeguarding policies and procedures in place.
“Everyone who works with, for, or comes into contact with a charity must be treated with respect and have their rights protected,” he said.
“Supporters and the public rightly have high expectations of how charities work and hold them to high standards. They care about causes, and while we never take public donations for granted, we believe that people will continue to support charities and continue to give.
“Charities need to show real and meaningful change, be transparent, and fully accountable. By being upfront, honest, and clear with supporters charities can keep support and continue to work to make the world a better place.”
Essex County Council is dedicated to improving Essex and the lives of our residents. Their ambition is to deliver the best quality of life in Britain. They aim to achieve this by providing high-quality, targeted services that deliver real value for money. Read more…
Chairman and trustee resigned amid investigation into more than £90,000 spent on consultancy firm they directed.
Firstsite, the ill-fated arts centre in Colchester, Essex, that has received or been promised around £10m in Arts Council funding, is in crisis after revelations that its chairman and a trustee faced accusations of a conflict of interest over expenditure of more than £90,000 on consultancy services. In June, a confidential independent report on the affair led the Charity Commission to describe the payments as “a serious incident”.
Noorzaman Rashid, Firstsite’s chairman, and fellow trustee Robert Surman resigned on 16 March this year. This followed the news that the arts centre had paid £91,040 between September 2015 and November 2016 for human-resources consultancy advice from the company Friary West, based in Maldon, Essex; both Rashid and Surman were directors of the firm.
Rashid had been appointed the chairman of Firstsite in July 2015 and became a director of Friary West in January 2016, while the arts centre was still making payments to the company. Surman, who was appointed a trustee of Firstsite in September 2015, also became a director of Friary West in January 2016. Two of the firm’s four directors were therefore on Firstsite’s board.
In March, Firstsite appointed the accountancy firm Mazars “to investigate the links”. Its report, submitted in June, shows that both men “declared their interest to the board of trustees and its register of interests”. Both also “stated that they received no financial reward for the work they undertook for the company”.
The report recommends that Firstsite should “review its existing procurement policy and define the specific criteria for selecting suppliers”. It also says that the arts centre should “provide staff and trustees with training so that they understand the procurement policy adopted by Firstsite and can apply it correctly”.
After receiving the report, a spokesman for the arts centre said: “Firstsite’s board has accepted the findings and recommendations of the investigation by Mazars and is actively reviewing the operation of its procurement policy in light of this to ensure that it is effective, supported by robust procurement procedures and with appropriate collective decision-making for high-value contracts.”
The Charity Commission also responded in a statement, which said: “The [Firstsite] trustees have reported a serious incident to the commission and we are aware of concerns about Firstsite’s use of its charitable funds. There are circumstances in which trustees’ professional connections may bring benefits to a charity’s work; however, it is vital that any conflicts of interest are managed effectively in order to maintain public trust and confidence in the charity. We will be assessing information provided by the charity and will be engaging with the trustees to ensure that they are acting in line with their legal duties and our guidance.”
Major funder had concerns
In recent years, Firstsite’s major source of funding has been Arts Council England. In 2014, it was awarded £815,000 a year for the period 2015/16 to 2018/19, but by February 2015, the Arts Council had become concerned about the centre’s viability and the three-year arrangement was replaced with a one-year grant. In June 2017, after the Arts Council was reassured about Firstsite’s revised plans, a further two years’ funding was reinstated; this runs from April this year. The long-term funding therefore came into force just a month after the revelations about the payments to Friary West.
In June, a spokeswoman for the Arts Council told us: “We welcome the measures that Firstsite has taken to examine its governance procedures. Both its management and its board are working hard to implement the recommendations of the independent [Mazars] review.”
We have not received a response to a request for comment from Rashid and Surman.
The number of charity shops is soaring in the West Midlands – sparking fears small independent businesses are disappearing from the high street.
An exclusive analysis of figures from NOMIS shows that in 2017 there were 375 charity shops in the metropolitan area, 39 per cent more compared to the 270 registered in 2010.
Solihull saw the biggest increase locally – charity shops went up by 75 per cent in seven years from 20 to 35.
Birmingham followed with an increase of 61 per cent from 90 to 145 while the number of charity shops in Walsall has increased by 50 per cent from 20 to 30.
Across the UK, charity shops have soared by a third, or 32 per cent, from 8,550 to 11,260.
According to chartered accountants Kreston Reeves, which ran a charity shops survey in 2016, “charity shops generally perform best during a recession”.
As their report says, “the Brexit vote is a bright spot on the horizon for charity shops as many commentators believe it may return the country to recession.”
Charity shops pay only 20 per cent of the standard business rates which makes it easier for them to take over premises that might otherwise stay empty.
Commenting on the national trend, a Charity Retail Association spokesperson said: “The success in raising charity shop numbers is down to many factors.
“It is an environmentally-friendly way to shop and the public is always keen for a bargain.
“Our research shows that the amount of charity shops in one particular area is not linked to deprivation.
“The UK public is always generous when it comes to raising money for charity and we see no sign of that declining.”